Last night, with my spirits in kind order and my head spinning clock wise, I have thought over Lex’s argument and his proposal in great detail.
The issue with human morality is that the person who leads us to the path of what is “Just” is often branded as a saint[1] and it marks beginning of another sect with its own followers. The issue is this – what the saint wanted to achieve was not to have another sect or have him branded as a god incarnate but to achieve that people should realize the true self inside them and use the faculties provided by either god or the compounds, depends on whichever side of god one stands. These faculties are free will and reason. The critics of this write-up are requested to please read the analysis further if and only if they believe that each and every individual is endowed with these two faculties because my analysis and arguments presented in this paper are based on this basic premise.
What happens is that people on losing physical contact with the saint tend to fall again to their basic weaknesses. Ones who had access to the saint start to act as his missionaries and exploit people by making them believe in whatever they say. The obvious distortions of teachings are made. Power, ever the enticing mistress, extends its vice-like grip on them and they start expanding their realm of influence. What for the rest of followers? They start to conform to whatever the new seat of authority says because of their need to fit in.
The instinct to survive takes over and daily worries and vain desires overcome their logical mind. The numbness renders them ineffective and fuels the ever growing demand of power for the new messiahs. Now, this is the mentality that is being exploited by Lex. When he poses the question “Who decides what is right or wrong?” he is pinching the boil that the religion has propounded for ages. The religion which tells this is right this is wrong; this is good this is evil. This has direct implications upon human tendencies which are going to help them make choices that might be right or wrong to an individual but religion by inculcating its dogmas[2] make them flush with guilt the instant they do something that is contrary to dogma. Why guilt because our friends have long forgotten to apply their faculties to differentiate between good and bad. This again feeds into our new age messiahs hands. They grow still more powerful because it’s only they who can atone the poor guy for the supposed “Sin”.
However, the logic of a truth is simple; truth is that that appeals to an individual and his inner self after putting it across the fire of logic, aided by objectivity granted by free will. Truth is about realization and not dictation. However there are a few questions that are worth considering about Lex’s logic and the situation at hand. Who is he to decide what is good or bad for people? Why is it that people are following him? Why has he not exterminated me? Instead he needs my help! What is it that I can do?
I recall when I was initiated into the order of the champions of good. I tested each of the thoughts that were put to me as good and only after careful and objective analysis I was convinced of what is right and what is not. Again the two champions of mine will and logic helped me decide my future.
What Lex is doing currently is quite the opposite which is trying to influence people into subjugation. He himself is not following the dictum that he gave me “who decides what is right or wrong” in other words “To each his own”.
Why are the people following him? Let’s go back to my argument in third paragraph. The need to fit in and survive. To have someone take care of their daily worries and in return he can have their unpledged support. Result? Be happy or sad afterwards? I can’t say that as of now. Because then I would allow my own morals to interfere and not let others take an individual call. So what is it that I will do? I shall start by putting across to people my views about how the actions of people are going to impact them and their surroundings in long term, no value judgment just plain facts and argument. Then some would start using their own logic and values to weigh my arguments. They may or may not agree but what it will do is start to apply their minds more to what is happening to them.
I know they may come to an entirely different conclusion about morality which may be very similar to what Lex has taught them. But as a crusader of truth my job is to show people the way through which they should conduct themselves. However, there is a strong possibility that they might revert back to the values of the old. Why? Answer lies in the twin clues. First, even though Lex could have killed me to exterminate all those who had differing views to his, he hasn’t. Is it that HE CAN’T kill me (The eternal battle between the real good and the bad)? Second, he has asked my help to rule the world. Maybe his magic is being seen through by some and old values and their beholders are finding renewed acquaintance with people, therefore he wants me, a champion of morality of old, to come out and help him kill this small niggle for ever.
PS: Sati, in a distant land, was once a socially acceptable practice sanctioned by the powerful of the times. Yet people with sound logic were able to see through the dogma and challenge it, and now the whole world praise those people as visionary. Therefore people need to trust their mental faculties to arrive at good and bad. To Each His Own.